Sunday, October 2, 2011

Manna-hata

Manna-hata, a Lenape term meaning "island of many hills," became Manhattan when translated into the English language by an Englishman working for the Dutch who had established a colony on the island.

The Lenape were defrauded of the island by the Dutch in 1626.

As Georgetta Stonefish Ryan (Lenape) writes for the National Museum of the American Indian:
The “sale” of Manhattan was a misunderstanding. In 1626 the director of the Dutch settlement, Peter Minuit, “purchased” Manhattan for sixty guilders worth of trade goods. At that time Indians did everything by trade, and they did not believe that land could be privately owned, any more than could water, air, or sunlight. But they did believe in giving gifts for favors done. The Lenni Lenape—one of the tribes that lived on the island now known as Manhattan—interpreted the trade goods as gifts given in appreciation for the right to share the land. We don't know exactly what the goods were or exactly how much a guilder was worth at that time. It has been commonly thought that sixty guilders equaled about twenty-four dollars. But the buying power of twenty-four dollars in 1626 is not known for sure.
As would be repeated across the region, the Lenape did not realize that the Dutch meant to claim the lands for their exclusive use -- an exclusivity that the Dutch would work violently to protect against the Lenape and then the English.

In 1653, in fact, the Dutch built a wall attempting to block Lenape, other Native nations, and the English from attacking "their" settlement. By 1700, when the English assumed Dutch land holdings in the region, they tore down the wall and paved a street over its location that they called "Wall Street."

The English would be defeated by the Americans. The Americans would preserve "Wall Street" -- and all of Manhattan -- as their own.

The Americans would never redress the history of Native land fraud that had made the U.S. possible. They would continue this fraud by violating their first ratified treaty with a Native nation -- the Lenape in 1778. This treaty provided -- among other things -- safe passage for Americans through Lenape territory during their war with the English. As all of the treaties that followed, it was a treaty that would be violated by the Americans in the name of U.S. sovereignty and territorial rights.

"Wall Street" is only possible because of this history of land fraud and treaty violation.

The "United States" is only possible because of its still imperial-colonial relations with Native peoples.

What "Wall Street" and the U.S. have become -- an imperial-colonial power over the world's economics and the laws that protect it -- is a direct legacy of the fraud and violence committed against Native nations.

Perhaps those who now claim to OCCUPY WALL STREET in the name of reforming America's economy could remember their history and call it something else (see Racialicious' post for more discussion of the importance of language in opposition). Wall Street is, after all, already an occupied territory. 

As are all of U.S. land "holdings" in northern America, the Pacific, and the Caribbean.

Decolonize the opposition! 
(especially now that it is OCCUPYING L.A., Seattle, San Francisco, Chicago....) 

(Woman in picture below: Jennie Bob [Lenape],1915)


7 comments:

  1. is anyone organizing a first nations action on wall street?
    isn't that the implication of the call to decolonize?

    How do we make this founding theft present, central, visible to cameras?
    To literally declare this to be land shared by all
    as per the original agreement

    100 or 1000 or 10000 native americans march to zuccotti park, shake hands and exchange gifts, conduct an appropriate ceremony, hold a press conference to tell the story of the original theft, and declare the park to be land owned by none but shared by all

    not like, this is our land and now you, the imperialists have to leave
    but rather, this is the land we agreed to share, so your property claims and system of ownership is void (and banking system) is void
    at least, for now, in this one small area

    the point being as much to claim that much mental space
    as geographic space
    just instill a small doubt
    that the whole thing is founded on fraud and theft

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thank you for this poster! We've put it on our Occupy/Decolonize Tucson site, http://www.facebook.com/napsky

    ReplyDelete
  3. Indian tribal sovereignty to Manhattan Island as part of the Hudson River drainage basin territory of the greater Mahican tribe is being asserted in the US Supreme Court. See, http://mightisnotright.org/.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Great points. It's not just that we've losing public space, but we're gaining an unsatiable appetite for private interests. The movement to take back the park, a citywide movement to take back all privately held parks, make the city actually do it's job, would mean a lot historically and I just think enliven people with the spirit of shared interests. Damn, OWS is really on some next shit. So excited...

    ReplyDelete
  5. I want to help.
    Call me.
    302-399-1235

    ReplyDelete